The era of whistleblowing and the need for transparency and supportive legislation in public procurement
By The Procurement School
Whistleblowers can change the world. And the world needs changing. As dramatic as it may sound, real change requires brave actions and loud voices.
However, unveiling corruption and fraud can come with repercussions and grave consequences, including the loss of livelihoods and even lives.
Protect them we must, as whistleblowers play a vital role in unveiling the nefarious actions that undermine democracy and have corrosive effects on society. Around the globe, whistleblowers have played a significant role in blowing the lid off of the wrongdoings of Cambridge Analytics, Perdue Pharma, Facebook and countless others, ushering in a new era of accountability.
However, Canada, and more specifically, it’s public procurement, is falling behind.
Procurement holds great power. And with great power comes great responsibility, and along with it, the opportunity for fraud and corruption. Unfortunately, when transparency and accountability are lacking, opportunities are exploited, and corruption flourishes.
Rather than safeguarding taxpayer dollars and ensuring optimal allocation of resources through procurement best practices, fraud and corruption in Government contracting can lead to increased costs and safety risks.
For example, the lives of Military members deployed to war zones were put at risk by a U.S. Government contractor who failed to maintain nine helicopters in accordance with contract requirements. Despite not meeting requirements, the aircrafts were certified as “fully mission capable.”
5 Ways in which Government contractors may commit fraud include:
Submitting contract bids that include false statements
Bid rigging by offering kickbacks for Government contracts
Misrepresenting project costs or knowingly underbidding
Failing to adhere to meet contract specification requirements while certifying adherence
Cross-charging or inaccurate cost allocation (e.g., charging a cost that was incurred on a project under a fixed-price contract to a “cost-plus” contract)
The False Claims Act: Spurring Accountability
Canada has fallen far behind other countries in supportive legislation that helps combat corruption, and it’s no small deal. In the U.S., the 2021 False Claims Act is successfully being leveraged to motivate whistleblowers through financial compensation and protect them from retaliation, making it unlawful for employers to suspend, discharge, threaten or harass the whistleblower for their actions.
According to Whistleblower law firm Hagens Berman, “The False Claims Act authorizes whistleblowers to sue companies and individuals that defraud the Government. These suits are filed under seal in federal court and investigated by the Department of Justice. In return, a whistleblower is rewarded by the Government with a significant portion of any recovered funds. In a successful suit, the whistleblower can receive between 15 and 30 percent of the Government’s overall recovery.”
In the case of the unsafe Military aircraft, AAR Corp and its subsidiary, AAR Airlift Group Inc., agreed to pay $11,088,000 to resolve the allegations and the whistleblower who exposed the contractors was awarded over $2 million.
While Canada’s current legislation focuses on handling allegations of transgressions, it almost completely fails to protect public or private sector whistleblowers from retaliation or deleterious effects.
To keep whistleblowers safe and encourage them to step forward, Canada must update its legal framework and align with internationally recognized best practices.
The Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act (PSDPA)
“The Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act (PSDPA) gives federal public sector employees and others a secure and confidential process for disclosing serious wrongdoing in the workplace, as well as protection from acts of reprisal. It is part of the Government of Canada’s ongoing commitment to promoting ethical practices in the public sector.” — Government of Canada.
Despite its intention, as submitted by Transparency International Canada, the PSDPA has some major shortcomings that have brought its effectiveness in protecting whistleblowers into question.
Firstly, the PSDPA puts the onus on the whistleblower to prove the employer acted in retaliation with adverse actions, something the whistleblower is unlikely to be able to do. Instead, best practices put the onus on employers to prove that any negative actions against the whistleblower were not intended as retribution.
Secondly, there is an egregious lack of laws to prevent any reprisals from being taken in the first place.
Today, only six provinces of Canada have whistleblowing laws, and of them, Ontario stands as the only province that provides a channel for whistleblowers who have suffered reprisals to seek a remedy. Yet, “none of Canada’s whistleblowing laws contains adequate measures for preventing or halting reprisals in the first place, before the whistleblower suffers serious harm.”
Laws are primarily focused on the public sector, with virtually no coverage of the private sector. Furthermore, for the wrongdoings the PSDPA covers for the public sector, it does not allow private sector participants to be investigated or sanctioned.
Transparency International Canada warns that there are currently no steps being taken to bring Canadian laws in line with best practices, despite Canada’s G20 commitment. Moreover, despite the Treasury Board’s legal obligation to conduct a five-year review of the legislation and report on the review to Parliament and the Senate, to date, no review has been conducted.
To say this is unacceptable is to minimize its impact. It is abhorrent and a disservice to Canadians.
Corruption is known to impede investment and a country’s economic growth. However, in the end, citizens are the ones who suffer, as ultimately, if left unchecked, corruption leads to deteriorating education and healthcare and contributes to lowering the standard of living.
Critically, corruption leads to loss of trust between citizens and Government, can perpetuate inequalities and escalate to conflict, violence and extremism.
Canada, we do, in fact, have a problem!
Lifting the veil on the misconduct that plagues our Government spending is the first step in ensuring we do better. We need to look only to our neighbours to see the incontestable impacts of robust and efficacious whistleblower laws. It’s high time we follow suit.
The era of whistleblowing and the need for transparency and supportive legislation in public procurement By The Procurement School Whistleblowers can change the world. And the world needs changing. As dramatic as it may sound, real change requires brave actions and loud voices. However, unveiling corruption and fraud can come with repercussions and grave consequences, […]
It is often said that the best defence is a good offence. This proactive thinking is prevalent throughout our public procurement training, emphasizing the importance of carving out adequate time to do effective procurement planning. Part of that planning should include considering strategies for selection of the ‘best value’ supplier – which will vary depending […]
It is easy for procurement professionals to understand that the best indicator of how a contractor will do in the future is how they have performed in the past, but very few are working with a credible, objective and fact-based system for collecting and utilizing this information on a regular basis. And given the specific […]
Author: Debby Shapero ProppWhether you are contracting to licence or acquire custom software, hardware, or related services, IT procurement creates unique challenges and is often associated with high costs, complexity, and a relatively high rate of failure. Improperly informed IT decisions can be costly. These challenges can be daunting even to the most seasoned practitioners. […]
As a company that provides education in public procurement, this is perhaps the most common question that arises. While there are many similarities, the nuances of public legislation and free trade requirements create a procurement environment that is more regulated, demands a greater level of transparency, and requires vigilance to stay on top of the constantly […]
In the last issue of The Legal Edge, we reported on the pivotal Supreme Court of Canada decision in Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, which expanded the organizing principle of the duty of good faith to include a “duty to act honestly” in general contractual dealings. While acting honestly and making sure that you […]